Lip
Service Does Not Answer Abuse Of And To Military Service
Deborah
Venable
07/05/02
As
we continue to celebrate the birthday of America this weekend, we hear
references to our past and present military personnel’s sacrifices to secure
our freedom. One statistic I noted with
interest compares the reaction after Pearl Harbor resulting in a significant
increase in voluntary enlistments, with the reaction after the 911 Attack. This did result in an increase of inquiries
into military service, but not a significant increase in actual
enlistments. Surprised?
Further
comparing that the attack on Pearl Harbor was mainly aimed at the military and
not civilians, and the death toll was considerably higher in the 911 Attack, we
might begin to wonder why the above statistic is not backwards. We might – only if the last fifty-plus years
had not transpired in the manner that they have. Only if we had no basis for comparison of society’s view of
military service today as compared to yesterday. Only if we had not been made aware of gross abuses by and to our
military personnel, both before and especially since World War II.
But
we should not wonder given the proof that this society does not view commitment
to anything with the same fervor that past societies of Americans did. If citizens of today cannot even commit
themselves to belief systems that embrace family values and the lifelong
marriages and family building that is the product of that commitment, why
should we expect that the children of these broken homes and “alternative
lifestyles” know anything about committing to the preservation of America? To those brave young souls that do enlist in
the military through a sense of duty, we owe a special debt of gratitude in my
humble opinion. For the most part,
however, this “gratitude” is only given in the form of lip service by Americans
feeling especially patriotic on certain holidays. In the business as usual modern military, we find only a small
public outrage at the life-altering abuses some of these service personnel have
already suffered or will be mandated to suffer.
Take
the issue of the anthrax vaccine for instance.
This should not even be an issue, but it is. I understand that military chain of command necessitates the
issuance of and compliance to orders to maintain military discipline, but when
those orders are issued over something as controversial as mandatory anthrax
vaccination with a suspect agent clouded with proven disastrous results, the
“chain” is faulty, therefore, the discipline is bogus, and the integrity of the
military as a force we can count on is severely jeopardized.
Recently
Sierra Times published a story written by Kathy
Hubbell,
whose son is currently serving in the United States Air Force. It is compelling and should be read and
remembered the next time you hear some politician pretending to care about our
military personnel. She provides many
links in this article. If this one doesn’t get to you, I don’t know what
will! This kind of abuse of our
military personnel, forcing them into a Catch 22 situation, can no longer be
tolerated if we are to preserve any of our freedoms while we go through the
motions of a War On Terrorism.
Keep
in mind also that according to many state and federal laws, parents are placed
in the same sort of Catch 22 situation when they wrestle with the decision of
whether or not to allow their children to be injected with the growing number
of vaccines against an ever-increasing list of illnesses and diseases. Don’t forget to keep in mind that this issue
can always be traced directly back to the pharmaceutical industry that produces
the agents being foisted on a society no longer allowed to make an informed
decision about risks. It is no accident
that this industry provides a large portion of funding to a government that
would see us in tyranny.
Home Rant Page Feedback
Welcome!